Press "Enter" to skip to content

Iran, Hong Kong, and the Desperation of a Declining U.S. Empire

The U.S. empire’s global influence projects, especially the ones in Iran and Hong Kong, have a different nature from the ones that were carried out when American power was still in a stable state. There’s now an aspect of desperation to what America is doing abroad, an unacknowledged but ever-present reality that the purveyors of Western imperialism are fighting a losing battle against the inevitable process of imperial collapse.

As the capitalist class loses its reliable means for bending global politics to its will, the foundations of capitalist markets themselves are becoming increasingly fractured. The capitalist world’s financial system, which for the last decade has been running on the same types of fraud that caused the 2008 economic crash, is due for an unraveling that all evidence says will create a depression-level downturn. Germany is already in an early stage of recession, and the slowdown in American corporate profits from recent months portends to the crisis reaching the United States.

As these events develop in relation to all of the other threats to the global capitalist order—climate change, growing class discontent from the world’s poor and working people, civil unrest, and ongoing refugee crises—the reaction from the ruling class is to step up the U.S./NATO empire’s military expansionism and propaganda.

There’s a term that historians use for this reactive phase that empires go through during their final years: micro-militarism. In the cases of Iran and Hong Kong, America’s micro-militarism is on display in ways that are different but revealing.

The U.S. Empire’s Losing Battle Against Iran (and against the other anti-imperialist countries)

America’s campaign against Iran is motivated by the desire to reverse Iran’s process of abandoning the dollar as a means of international exchange. Since Iran made this shift away from the dollar, it’s been targeted with increased economic warfare, bogus accusations of rogue nuclear development, and claims that it supports terrorism. Yet despite all the histrionic accusations, America’s political establishment continues to almost unanimously dislike the idea of starting an outright war with Iran.

Washington still hasn’t invaded Iran, because doing so could create a war so gigantic that it would make it necessary to bring back the draft, and because the American public still overwhelmingly hates the idea of a war with Iran. A Gallup poll from August stated that 8 in 10 Americans favor nonmilitary methods for stopping Iran from getting nuclear weapons. The Trump administration’s recent efforts to blame Iran for the bombing of a Saudi petroleum facility (a bombing which Houthi fighters have claimed responsibility for) isn’t going to sway the public to view Iran otherwise. As independent journalist Caitlin Johnstone has pointed out, the Trump White House is losing the narrative battle over Iran and, in the absence of narrative supremacy, Trump’s handlers in the deep state don’t want war with Iran to start because they know it would cause far too much backlash from the populace.

Iran has become an obstacle that the U.S. can’t overcome. A war with Iran would undoubtedly be the crisis that makes this fragile empire implode; the U.S. would have to face up against a militarily mighty enemy in this scenario, and the American public would quickly turn against the war machine on the same level as what happened during the anti-Vietnam War movement. So the U.S. has lost Iran as an economic and political asset for the foreseeable future, just as it’s so far failed to achieve regime change in Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Syria, north Korea, Russia, and China. The U.S. would of course lose if it were to try to overthrow all of these governments through military invasion.

Amid this piling up of losses in the game of empire, the members of the neoconservative political and media class have attempted plans for overthrowing these countries through approaches other than directly invading them. Naturally, the method of trying to overthrow governments by supporting opposition groups within the target countries has become unusually prevalent in U.S. operations in the last decade.

In 2017, National Council of Resistance of Iran associate Ali Safavi wrote a column titled “Regime change in Iran does not equal war in Iran,” which advocated for this approach. Despite the sensible veneer that Safavi intended to integrate into the column, it was clearly meant to be a propaganda piece for the People’s Mujahedin of Iran (the MEK), a violent and cult-like organization that was at one point  labeled a terrorist group by the U.S. government. This is apparent from the fact that the latest tweet on Safavi’s Twitter profile is an endorsement of the MEK, and from the fact that the MEK has clear allies in Washington.

But just as this year’s attempted Venezuela coup has failed to gain enough support from within Venezuela’s military, as Nicaragua’s Sandinista government has prevailed amid U.S. operations to sow unrest in that country, and as Assad (with the crucial help of Russia) has defeated the U.S.-backed insurrectionary forces in Syria, the MEK’s plans for manufactured revolution within Iran are far from being realized.

The U.S. is just as far from carrying out such a regime change operation in China, where the strongest contingent of U.S.-backed anti-China activism exists on a small island that’s not even in China or genuinely part of the Chinese government.

The West’s last-ditch effort at recolonizing Hong Kong

Hong Kong is a holdout from Western colonialism whose time of separation from Chinese authority is running out. In 2047, Hong Kong will cede control to China. The Hong Kong protests, which are taking place with support from American destabilization networks, are using China as a scapegoat for Hong Kong’s own problems. This is the tool the West is using to try to secure control over Hong Kong.

What’s strange is that this Western effort towards recolonizing Hong Kong is being undertaken when there are still decades before the 2047 expiration date. What is the West trying to accomplish by initiating this struggle at a time when Hong Kong isn’t even in the process of being absorbed by China?

In my estimation, there are two facets to the West’s motives. One, the U.S. is now waging an intensifying cold war against China, and promoting the “pro-democracy” anti-Beijing Hong Kong protests is a perfect opportunity for creating anti-Chinese propaganda. Second, this seemingly poorly timed Western intervention in Hong Kong is part of the process of declining empire micro-militarism. The Western imperialists, seeing their influence wane throughout the globe, want to create a new American proxy state in Hong Kong. This way, at the very least, Hong Kong won’t be lost to China in 2047.

Yet not even this attempt to fortify Western control over one little island is proving to be an effective endeavor for the empire. A top adviser to Hong Kong’s leader Carrie Lam said this week that the Hong Kong government doesn’t see any benefit to conceding to more of the demands from the protesters, meaning the U.S. and the right-wing protesters it supports won’t get their wish of overthrowing the island’s government. It now appears that the protests will fruitlessly continue, and that their increasingly violent nature will make it harder for the Western propaganda machine to manufacture support for them.

As the U.S. hits this dead end in Hong Kong, the fantasies from the Western neoconservative class of destroying the Chinese government look hilariously detached from any realistic projections of China’s future. Case in point, last month Joseph Bosco, a former senior fellow in the Asia-Pacific Program at the Atlantic Council, wrote a column about China’s potential dissolution titled “China’s Happy Future: One System, Six Countries.” Bosco’s prediction was based in his oddly specific estimate that “the lifespan of a major communist power is about seven decades,” and in his belief that the Chinese people are by and large on the verge of turning against their government and carrying out a drastic geopolitical split. (are you giggling yet?)

According to this narrative, Hong Kong is ground zero for the imminent nationwide uprising against the Chinese Communist Party. Yet Hong Kong’s anti-Beijing protests, which depend on U.S. backing, have actually been countered with massive pro-China protests within Hong Kong. And despite all of the assertions of popular rebellion from Western propagandists like Bosco, most Chinese people on the mainland also support the Chinese Communist Party.

“Why do so many people feel that the Chinese can’t possibly be OK with their government or society?” reflects the essayist Kaiser Kuo in an analysis from this year about why the Chinese like their current political and economic system. “It seems that many in [the] West deem the current Chinese government/society as wrong and that any ‘right-thinking’ person would agree and join in the fight.”

The cause of this Western blindspot is imperial hubris mixed with a growing mentality of desperate micro-militarism. At this stage, the U.S. can’t even conquer tiny Hong Kong, at least not without militarily intervening in the island. And despite the calls from the fanatical pro-colonial protesters for Trump to “free Hong Kong,” Washington knows that such an invasion would be insane. So all the Yankees can do is cheer on their hopeless regime change projects in Hong Kong and elsewhere, and engage in grand fantasies about new global conquests being just around the corner.

Imperial collapse and the turning tide of the class war

The purportedly socialist supporters of the Hong Kong protests have claimed that the people of Hong Kong are rightly rebelling against the policies of China, and that the Chinese Communist Party is guilty of engineering the island’s crisis of social inequality. In fact, China is a relatively small economic player within Hong Kong, and Hong Kong is unlikely to even have its unequal and unjust neoliberal system if China were to have substantial policy control over the island.

Whether the U.S. and its cheerleaders admit it or not, the Deng system and Xi Jinping’s “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics” have brought unparalleled increases in prosperity to China’s proletariat. China has lifted 800 million people out of poverty since the start of its current economic form, and China‘s life expectancy has gone up by 42 years since communism was established in the country. China continues to be guided by the principles of Marxism-Leninism, making it not a force for imperialism, but rather an enemy of global capitalism.

While many Western leftists claim otherwise, the protests against China are an attack against socialism and an endorsement of Western imperialism. But China, as well as its supporters within Hong Kong, are what can best bring Hong Kong out of its corporatist paradigm in the decades ahead.

“The conflict in Hong Kong is in fact a microcosm of the one the world will be facing in the decades ahead,” the socialist Thomas Hon Wing Polin has written.

“Led by the United States, the Western Empire is pushing countries to choose between itself and China—the Western way or the Chinese way. That is not a choice Beijing is obliging anyone to make, however. Alert, forward-looking individuals and nations can see that the predatory, zero-sum paradigm of the Western Empire is headed for the dustbin of history. For Hong Kong as for all humanity, the only viable way forward in the 21st century is peace, mutual understanding and cooperation, and win-win. China is blazing that particular path.”

The Western capitalist empire has demonstrated its growing weakness through its international defeats, as well as through its inability to prevent economic crisis and social instability. Now is the time for the global working class to strike back and defeat imperialism for good.

If you appreciated this article and believe in empowering truly independent journalists who can present analysis without worrying about upsetting corporate sponsors or losing access to mainstream media platforms, consider contributing on my behalf.

As discussed in our statement of purpose, we are determined to reclaim journalism from the clutches of corporatism. As such, we are driven and powered solely by the kindness and support of our readers. 100% of the proceeds of contributions to the author of this article. Click on the button above to make a contribution as you are able. Thank you for your continued support.

Follow Him

Rainer Shea

Rainer uses the written word to deconstruct establishment propaganda and to promote meaningful political action. His articles can also be found at Revolution Dispatch
Follow Him

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

%d bloggers like this: